### Impact of Trump Tariffs Ruling: Key Takeaways
A recent US Court of International Trade ruling struck down several tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump under the **1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)**. The affected tariffs include those targeting **fentanyl-related imports from China, Mexico, and Canada**, as well as the **10% baseline tariff on all US imports** announced in April. However, the decision does not impact Trump’s **25% tariffs on steel, aluminum, and auto parts**, which were implemented under different legal grounds. While an appeals court has temporarily allowed these tariffs to remain in place, the future of Trump’s trade policies remains uncertain.
### Financial and Trade Implications
The ruling could significantly alter US trade revenue. Data shows that the now-invalidated tariffs had generated **$11.8 billion from fentanyl-related duties and $1.2 billion from the 10% baseline tariff** since early 2025. In contrast, unaffected tariffs—such as those on metals, auto parts, and pre-existing China tariffs—brought in **$3.3 billion and $23.4 billion**, respectively. Analysts estimate that the struck-down tariffs could have raised **$200 billion annually**, meaning the ruling may reduce the **US average external tariff from 15% to 6.5%**—still a major increase from 2024’s 2.5%.
### Global Trade and Negotiation Fallout
The decision may weaken Trump’s leverage in ongoing trade negotiations. The **EU, Japan, and Australia** had been pressured to accelerate deals under tariff threats, but they may now delay concessions pending the appeal’s outcome. Meanwhile, global markets initially reacted positively to the ruling, though uncertainty persists. Trump could attempt to **reinstate tariffs under alternative legal frameworks**, such as **Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974**, or impose new sectoral tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. The **WTO has already warned** that Trump’s tariffs could shrink global trade by **0.2% in 2025**, reversing earlier growth projections.
This ruling marks a pivotal moment in US trade policy, with far-reaching consequences for domestic revenue, international negotiations, and the global economy.
Ez a cikk a Neural News AI (V1) verziójával készült.