Hungary has taken a firm stance against Ukraine, accusing it of violating international agreements by halting Russian oil shipments via the Druzhba pipeline. Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto declared that Hungary „will not give in to this blackmail” and announced that Budapest will block a 90 billion euro EU loan to Ukraine until oil flows resume. The disruption, which began on January 27 after a reported Russian drone attack, has left Hungary and Slovakia—the only EU nations still reliant on Druzhba pipeline oil—scrambling for alternatives. In response, Hungary has authorized the release of 1.8 million barrels from its strategic oil reserves to address supply shortages, though Croatia’s JANAF pipeline operator claims such measures are unnecessary due to ongoing non-Russian oil deliveries.
The situation has escalated into a broader geopolitical and economic dispute, with Hungary leveraging its EU membership to pressure Ukraine. Budapest argues that Ukraine’s actions breach the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, justifying its decision to withhold financial support. Meanwhile, Hungary’s state-owned oil company, MOL, is actively diversifying its supply chain, ordering tankers carrying oil from Saudi Arabia, Norway, Kazakhstan, Libya, and Russia to sustain its refineries in Hungary and Slovakia. This has led MOL to halt diesel deliveries to Ukraine, further straining bilateral relations. Slovakia has similarly declared an oil emergency, pledging to release 1.825 million barrels from its reserves to support the MOL-owned Slovnaft refinery.
Despite the tension, alternative supply routes are being mobilized to mitigate the crisis. JANAF reports that significant quantities of non-Russian crude are already en route to MOL via pipeline and tankers, with shipments expected to arrive in Croatia by early March. However, logistical delays mean it could take up to two weeks for the oil to reach refineries, prolonging the uncertainty. Hungary’s strategic reserves, which stood at 96 days’ worth of supply at the end of January, provide a temporary buffer, but the government’s decree allows MOL priority access to released reserves until mid-April, with a requirement to replenish them by late August.
The conflict underscores the fragile energy interdependencies in Europe, particularly for landlocked nations like Hungary and Slovakia that remain tethered to Soviet-era infrastructure. As both countries navigate the disruption, the standoff highlights the complex interplay between energy security, EU solidarity, and regional politics. With Hungary using financial leverage to demand the restoration of oil transit, the outcome could set a precedent for how EU members address infrastructure disputes with neighboring states, potentially influencing future energy and diplomatic negotiations within the bloc.
Ez a cikk a Neural News AI (V1) verziójával készült.